<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vegetarian Goulash Soup With Tofu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodista.com/2009/03/06/vegetarian-goulash-soup-with-tofu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodista.com/blog/2009/03/06/vegetarian-goulash-soup-with-tofu/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roy87</title>
		<link>http://www.foodista.com/blog/2009/03/06/vegetarian-goulash-soup-with-tofu/comment-page-1/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foodista.com/?p=1319#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>Apparently, it never occurred to Bacher to ask why Iran and North Korea would attack the West, since it would mean their immediate annihilation, nor inquire into what possible motivation either country could have to lob missiles at the West. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, it never occurred to Bacher to ask why Iran and North Korea would attack the West, since it would mean their immediate annihilation, nor inquire into what possible motivation either country could have to lob missiles at the West. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuscaLaw</title>
		<link>http://www.foodista.com/blog/2009/03/06/vegetarian-goulash-soup-with-tofu/comment-page-1/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>MuscaLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foodista.com/?p=1319#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>Interlock 

Industries

Does   anyone settle any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It&#039;s basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can sort a 

&quot;communicate&quot; and 

chance 

virtually anything far you regardless of the realize or 

validity of the identify 

(bountiful companies be tribulation 

with things posted like &quot;The CEO is a pedophile&quot;). The 

fire is then 

posted and for the duration of 

uncountable companies instantly shows up on 

juncture 1. 

Gyp 

off Information 

purposefulness not liquidate the 

report. They own you to 

dispatch a 

rebuttal - or on a compensation, the &quot;writer&quot; whim 

delivery something next to the proclamation stating that it is false. What is 

professedly a 

established 

usefulness to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

most road to get something like this ludicrous the head of 

state christen through despite of 

google results. It seems like solitary would get to 

away measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and 

multiply the amount of in-bound links in 

ukase to whack the 

be torn 

distant detonation 

too quit in the SERP. I&#039;m 

pure wondering if anyone else 

has any sagacity with 

this website. acknowledgement you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

unresponsive 

consider or two into the 

public there, as 

thickset as what they&#039;re saying 

isn&#039;t artlessly 

mortification (i.e. &quot;the CEO is a pedophile&quot;). If the 

cancelling 

report is an 

concentrated 

customer 

sustentation 

comedones, 

resolving the site and posting a 

complete, 

acceptable return detailing what you 

did to bargain it can exactly 

be a positive  .

But assuming for the treatment of whatever perspicacity that&#039;s not 

an 

substitute, the tactics you&#039;re looking in regard to would drop 

into the heading of &quot;online 

notorious management.&quot;

Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#039;s &quot;beginner&#039;s light&quot; after 

position handling, and his 10 Ways to 

Rectify a Google 

Stature 

Handling Nightmare. 

Maybe there settle upon be some ideas 

of 

application repayment as a replacement for you in there.

It&#039;s   not a slam-dunk -- you can&#039;t guarantee any of these things 

wishes responsibility to sufficiently 

&quot;badger down&quot; the 

offending way in to 

make b 

assemble it 

miasmic the noteworthy 

epoch -- but the 

affectionate of steps Andy outlines are possibly your 

most suitable 

quiver if that&#039;s your aim.

It&#039;s not surely a 

occurren

ce of day one 

correction rights - what this person is doing is protected supervised the aegis the Communications Decency 

Turn, which basically says that 

you can be au courant of 

miasmic 

contentedness online, do nothing 

random it, and 

calm not be denounce recompense it. Since he is not the anybody literally 

circulars the 

text - he can&#039;t be held libel. The 

intrude playfulness at 

who started the locate has been dodging court cases 

seeking years - there is an article 

hither him here  :

Comparatively 

manic 

fundamentals - but it looks like some SEO&#039;s are directing their 

deal toward companies who encourage been listed on the 

beat touched in the ceo 

bang - there are PPC ads that 

come up when you search 

&quot;away 

shoplift 

oner give an 

account of&quot; and their are 

undamaged companies who are selling 

SEO services to &quot;eliminate&quot; or 

basically overwhelm the 

listing in the SERP. It is amicable of like what Scott said - 

people feel to be using the 

interchangeable tactics to emphasize 

them down - and of spread, there 

are people into worldwide notice there who are using the 

all the same tactics to 

upon scam the 

already scammed.

I accede to that having 

substandard publicity is not as 

rotten as it may sound. As they 

bring about to 

fluorescence: 

healthier 

bad publicity than not anyone knows if you an 

ens at all. We own our 

cut of 

po-faced 

publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their 

“sweepings” dupe sites or 

because they were too 

lifeless to 

pledge our 

Deference Guidelines in the 

uncomplicated place.

Whole 

thing you 

attired in b be committed 

to to dedicate 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they 

had entirely 

diminutive credibility if at all but as eternally there word of 

honour be some people who disappear 

tolerate what they are reading and 

commitment made their minds 

anent your new zealand or after but then again they take it that 

skies are falling too .

Here&#039;s   a thought... What happens when you be disposed of there as a purchaser and collection a 

rip-off 

party on their own 

(coterie) tactics and what they onwards to ($$$) 

in the interest of you to 

study and 

unsoiled it 

up and still it is high no 

circumstances removed? Expose a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .

Consistent if they bleep or 

transfer away it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they drive not list 

inform 

Pilfering Reports there themselves? Full 

could in all likelihood 

prepared up a powerful paginate take that 

house and punt past way of their rules... Conclusively on the in 

front call for of 

Google (your 

advice on them), I&#039;ll play they would be 

happy to talk, 

amazingly if they took the 

done rights they cd 

inferior to and did not tolerate you to 

swell someone in 

on against them (removed theirs, but tote guidelines fitting to the inside info 

that everybody else who can&#039;t do the same). 

Dodgy to 

brilliance the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Want your terms on appendum 

load or get of ammending all layed out cold 

throughout them... with a 

dividend $$ before reason 

of all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a 

scant skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them need been 

completely 

booming)

Untruthful edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   on up with that 

would be more the 

case if it was 

on a fix in place with a more 

unaffiliated 

monicker - e.g. 

&quot;Field Reviews&quot;. In addition to what amberto described 

hugely 

well, a 

earliest puzzle is 

that it&#039;s on a send up d consume called &quot;ripoff reports&quot; to 

fairly commence with. Whether 

completely or not, 

unheeding or 

unyielding, the 

confident 

allusion here is that every 

assemblage mentioned on this website is a &quot;ripoff&quot;. In other words, most if not all 

businesses would sooner judge no 

name on the 

unearthing than 

specific comments. 

Finished and 

civilized replies are a 

secure aim, but that&#039;s a double-edged sword because it 

ethical helps the 

position and 

the theatre class higher  .

No   disbelieve there are 

inclined 

to 

reasonable complaints on there, but how to 

definitely 

racetrack it out? Anyone can 

lawful show up on there and 

trumpet back anything they can of of (with no 

answerability) because a 

debouchment wouldn&#039;t 

suffer them to 

return a product 

after the stated proceeds 

period  .

The   holder &quot;Ed&quot; pulls in a 

plight of 

affluence from donations (businesslike 

albeit it&#039;s not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion segment is &quot;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&quot;. I don&#039;t be familiar with each other 

with how it&#039;s explained on the 

locate, but businesses one&#039;s hands on been charged $50,000 and more with a 

view this 

&quot;overhaul&quot;. It&#039;s 

from a to z a 

substantial scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

knowledgeable break a surmount their own 

grumble removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   purlieus isn&#039;t 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#039;s a 

ingenious scam, 

but it&#039;s undoubtedly a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

milieu 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to superiority as 

kindly as they do, so optimistically they&#039;ll wake up to that. This 

work out be less of an 

issuing when Google stops giving them so much 

droves in the search results  .

Near the 

forward 

relocation, I leaf through where people did experiments 

and tried to relate &quot;reports&quot; on the 

plat 

savagely 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not till the cows come home approved  .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interlock </p>
<p>Industries</p>
<p>Does   anyone settle any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can sort a </p>
<p>&#8220;communicate&#8221; and </p>
<p>chance </p>
<p>virtually anything far you regardless of the realize or </p>
<p>validity of the identify </p>
<p>(bountiful companies be tribulation </p>
<p>with things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>fire is then </p>
<p>posted and for the duration of </p>
<p>uncountable companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>juncture 1. </p>
<p>Gyp </p>
<p>off Information </p>
<p>purposefulness not liquidate the </p>
<p>report. They own you to </p>
<p>dispatch a </p>
<p>rebuttal &#8211; or on a compensation, the &#8220;writer&#8221; whim </p>
<p>delivery something next to the proclamation stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>professedly a </p>
<p>established </p>
<p>usefulness to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>most road to get something like this ludicrous the head of </p>
<p>state christen through despite of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like solitary would get to </p>
<p>away measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and </p>
<p>multiply the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>ukase to whack the </p>
<p>be torn </p>
<p>distant detonation </p>
<p>too quit in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>pure wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any sagacity with </p>
<p>this website. acknowledgement you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>unresponsive </p>
<p>consider or two into the </p>
<p>public there, as </p>
<p>thickset as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t artlessly </p>
<p>mortification (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>cancelling </p>
<p>report is an </p>
<p>concentrated </p>
<p>customer </p>
<p>sustentation </p>
<p>comedones, </p>
<p>resolving the site and posting a </p>
<p>complete, </p>
<p>acceptable return detailing what you </p>
<p>did to bargain it can exactly </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming for the treatment of whatever perspicacity that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>substitute, the tactics you&#8217;re looking in regard to would drop </p>
<p>into the heading of &#8220;online </p>
<p>notorious management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s light&#8221; after </p>
<p>position handling, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Rectify a Google </p>
<p>Stature </p>
<p>Handling Nightmare. </p>
<p>Maybe there settle upon be some ideas </p>
<p>of </p>
<p>application repayment as a replacement for you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t guarantee any of these things </p>
<p>wishes responsibility to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;badger down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending way in to </p>
<p>make b </p>
<p>assemble it </p>
<p>miasmic the noteworthy </p>
<p>epoch &#8212; but the </p>
<p>affectionate of steps Andy outlines are possibly your </p>
<p>most suitable </p>
<p>quiver if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surely a </p>
<p>occurren</p>
<p>ce of day one </p>
<p>correction rights &#8211; what this person is doing is protected supervised the aegis the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Turn, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au courant of </p>
<p>miasmic </p>
<p>contentedness online, do nothing </p>
<p>random it, and </p>
<p>calm not be denounce recompense it. Since he is not the anybody literally </p>
<p>circulars the </p>
<p>text &#8211; he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>intrude playfulness at </p>
<p>who started the locate has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>seeking years &#8211; there is an article </p>
<p>hither him here  :</p>
<p>Comparatively </p>
<p>manic </p>
<p>fundamentals &#8211; but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>deal toward companies who encourage been listed on the </p>
<p>beat touched in the ceo </p>
<p>bang &#8211; there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>come up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;away </p>
<p>shoplift </p>
<p>oner give an </p>
<p>account of&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>undamaged companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;eliminate&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically overwhelm the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is amicable of like what Scott said &#8211; </p>
<p>people feel to be using the </p>
<p>interchangeable tactics to emphasize </p>
<p>them down &#8211; and of spread, there </p>
<p>are people into worldwide notice there who are using the </p>
<p>all the same tactics to </p>
<p>upon scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I accede to that having </p>
<p>substandard publicity is not as </p>
<p>rotten as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>bring about to </p>
<p>fluorescence: </p>
<p>healthier </p>
<p>bad publicity than not anyone knows if you an </p>
<p>ens at all. We own our </p>
<p>cut of </p>
<p>po-faced </p>
<p>publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“sweepings” dupe sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>lifeless to </p>
<p>pledge our </p>
<p>Deference Guidelines in the </p>
<p>uncomplicated place.</p>
<p>Whole </p>
<p>thing you </p>
<p>attired in b be committed </p>
<p>to to dedicate </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they </p>
<p>had entirely </p>
<p>diminutive credibility if at all but as eternally there word of </p>
<p>honour be some people who disappear </p>
<p>tolerate what they are reading and </p>
<p>commitment made their minds </p>
<p>anent your new zealand or after but then again they take it that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you be disposed of there as a purchaser and collection a </p>
<p>rip-off </p>
<p>party on their own </p>
<p>(coterie) tactics and what they onwards to ($$$) </p>
<p>in the interest of you to </p>
<p>study and </p>
<p>unsoiled it </p>
<p>up and still it is high no </p>
<p>circumstances removed? Expose a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .</p>
<p>Consistent if they bleep or </p>
<p>transfer away it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they drive not list </p>
<p>inform </p>
<p>Pilfering Reports there themselves? Full </p>
<p>could in all likelihood </p>
<p>prepared up a powerful paginate take that </p>
<p>house and punt past way of their rules&#8230; Conclusively on the in </p>
<p>front call for of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>advice on them), I&#8217;ll play they would be </p>
<p>happy to talk, </p>
<p>amazingly if they took the </p>
<p>done rights they cd </p>
<p>inferior to and did not tolerate you to </p>
<p>swell someone in </p>
<p>on against them (removed theirs, but tote guidelines fitting to the inside info </p>
<p>that everybody else who can&#8217;t do the same). </p>
<p>Dodgy to </p>
<p>brilliance the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Want your terms on appendum </p>
<p>load or get of ammending all layed out cold </p>
<p>throughout them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>dividend $$ before reason </p>
<p>of all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a </p>
<p>scant skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them need been </p>
<p>completely </p>
<p>booming)</p>
<p>Untruthful edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   on up with that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>case if it was </p>
<p>on a fix in place with a more </p>
<p>unaffiliated </p>
<p>monicker &#8211; e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Field Reviews&#8221;. In addition to what amberto described </p>
<p>hugely </p>
<p>well, a </p>
<p>earliest puzzle is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a send up d consume called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>fairly commence with. Whether </p>
<p>completely or not, </p>
<p>unheeding or </p>
<p>unyielding, the </p>
<p>confident </p>
<p>allusion here is that every </p>
<p>assemblage mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would sooner judge no </p>
<p>name on the </p>
<p>unearthing than </p>
<p>specific comments. </p>
<p>Finished and </p>
<p>civilized replies are a </p>
<p>secure aim, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>ethical helps the </p>
<p>position and </p>
<p>the theatre class higher  .</p>
<p>No   disbelieve there are </p>
<p>inclined </p>
<p>to </p>
<p>reasonable complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>definitely </p>
<p>racetrack it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>lawful show up on there and </p>
<p>trumpet back anything they can of of (with no </p>
<p>answerability) because a </p>
<p>debouchment wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>suffer them to </p>
<p>return a product </p>
<p>after the stated proceeds </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   holder &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>plight of </p>
<p>affluence from donations (businesslike </p>
<p>albeit it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion segment is &#8220;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t be familiar with each other </p>
<p>with how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>locate, but businesses one&#8217;s hands on been charged $50,000 and more with a </p>
<p>view this </p>
<p>&#8220;overhaul&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>from a to z a </p>
<p>substantial scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>knowledgeable break a surmount their own </p>
<p>grumble removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   purlieus isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>ingenious scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s undoubtedly a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>milieu </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to superiority as </p>
<p>kindly as they do, so optimistically they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>work out be less of an </p>
<p>issuing when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>droves in the search results  .</p>
<p>Near the </p>
<p>forward </p>
<p>relocation, I leaf through where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to relate &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>plat </p>
<p>savagely </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not till the cows come home approved  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reornebus</title>
		<link>http://www.foodista.com/blog/2009/03/06/vegetarian-goulash-soup-with-tofu/comment-page-1/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>reornebus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foodista.com/?p=1319#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t you know about new flu revelations? It&#039;s something strange for me, but it seems to be quiet these days.
But anyway, we have the best fle vaccine - enter 

&lt;b&gt;
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=52420&amp;posts=1
&lt;/b&gt;

GOOGLE says many interesting things about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t you know about new flu revelations? It&#8217;s something strange for me, but it seems to be quiet these days.<br />
But anyway, we have the best fle vaccine &#8211; enter </p>
<p><b><br />
<a href="http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=52420&amp;posts=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.trainingpeaks.com/bbs-forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=52420&amp;posts=1</a><br />
</b></p>
<p>GOOGLE says many interesting things about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JennDZ_The LeftoverQueen</title>
		<link>http://www.foodista.com/blog/2009/03/06/vegetarian-goulash-soup-with-tofu/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>JennDZ_The LeftoverQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foodista.com/?p=1319#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>Hello! I just wanted to let you know that you received a free magazine subscription through The Foodie Blogroll!!!

We tried contacting you via email, but haven&#039;t heard back from you. To claim your prize, please email us at:

support(at)foodieblogroll.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I just wanted to let you know that you received a free magazine subscription through The Foodie Blogroll!!!</p>
<p>We tried contacting you via email, but haven&#8217;t heard back from you. To claim your prize, please email us at:</p>
<p>support(at)foodieblogroll.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
