
Ugh. Bordeaux. I have images of aristocratic Brits circa 1890 declaring that the claret (a old, British term for Bordeaux when it was a much, much lighter red) they are enjoying is fine but needs another ten years in the cellar. (And everyone in the gentlemen's club nods in agreement.)
So maybe you get past the image of Bordeaux as the stuffiest of wines. Then you are confronted with a most intimidating label, like the one pictured above. I have worked in the wine industry for nine years and I am still mystified by these wines. Let's recap:
Grand Vin de Bordeaux
Fleur de Fonplégade
Saint-Emilion Grand Cru
Huh? And then I have to tell you it's approaching $50 a bottle. Now my job as a wine retailer just got exponentially more difficult. Now I know why we sell oceans of Yellow Tail; not that I'm for dumbing it down, but the French sure don't make it easy.
Fortunately, the Fleur de Fonplégade has a back label. Where I find out that this is a blend of 80% Merlot and 20% Cabernet Sauvignon. Like most wines from the right bank of Bordeaux, of which Saint-Emilion is one of the most prestigious sights, they are Merlot-driven. And Merlot is not the devil nor the foundation of all wines insipid; I can't believe that obnoxious movie Sideways still casts a shadow over the world of wine.
I should also note that the Fleur is the second wine of Chateau Fonplégade. Often many of the most prestigious wineries of Bordeaux make a second wine that used to be an afterthought, but now has the same degree of care and quality that made the first wine so notable. This is where you find (relative) bargains in Bordeaux. Oh, and Grand Vin at the top of the label? It looks impressive and sounds regal, but it's really a meaningless classification.
Most importantly, this is not a wine that needs to be cellared for decades before it can be enjoyed. This is a lovely, elegant red that is drinking beautifully now. And it's not some tannic beast that chips your enamel and makes you gums bleed. The Fleur is, simply, a true pleasure. And though versatile enough that you can enjoy it with heartier fish such as salmon (maybe with a side of grilled mushrooms), it certainly would be exceptional with rich, fatty meats like duck.
Bordeaux: now less confounding, more delicious.
Jameson Fink is a wine buyer at a bustling grocery store in Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood. He moved to Seattle from Chicago, where he dabbled in the restaurant and wine industries, five years ago to pursue a full-time career in wine. He'd rather be drinking Champagne and eating popcorn right now.
Add comment
Related Articles
- The World's Most Perfect Food and Wine Pairings (Part One): Champagne and Popcorn
- The World's Most Neglected Wines (Part One): Australian Riesling
- The World's Most Neglected Wines (Part Four): Cabernet Franc from the Loire Valley
- The World's Most Neglected Wines (Part Three): Chablis
- The World's Most Neglected Wines (Part Two): Enter the Dragonstone
- The Sub-$15 Bordeaux Battle
- World's Most Underrated Wines
- Champagne and Caviar Countdown to 2008 (Part I)
- New Year's Seafood Feast (Part II)
- Bordeaux Winemaker Sings to His Grapes
Related Recipes
Foodista on Facebook
Subscribe!
Get our weekly newsletter, which features recipe ideas and inspiration, or get a daily feed of the most popular stories on Foodista.













Comments
March 31, 2010
[...] The Most Intimidating Wines In The World (Part One): Bordeaux [...]
February 24, 2010
Looking forward to reading the next "Part." It would also be helpful if you included a map of where this wine is made (maybe in a link?).
Thanks!
February 17, 2010
Thanks for the much needed info.